账号:
密码:
建筑电气
 找回密码
 我要注册
查看: 2811|回复: 3

[规范条文] 美标的shall和should的定义

[复制链接]
     
发表于 2015-12-19 20:49:51 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?我要注册

×
3.2.4 Shall.  Indicates a mandatory requirement.
The term shall indicates a requirement of this standard and mandates that a specific provision
of NFPA 20 be followed. When the term shall is used with a specific provision of the standard,
compliance with that provision is mandatory. Any exceptions to a requirement of this standard
are specifically stated. The use of the term shall in an exception indicates that the exception
is applicable only under the conditions specified in the exception. Mandatory requirements of
NFPA 20 are found in the main body of the standard (see Chapters 1 through 14).
3.2.5 Should.  Indicates a recommendation or that which is advised but not required.
The term should indicates a recommendation of the standard. When the term should is used
with a provision of the standard, the provision is not intended to be mandatory. Recom-
mended provisions are limited to Annexes A and B of NFPA 20. The term should identifies a
good idea or a better practice. If the recommendation is not followed, the fire pump is still
expected to perform satisfactorily. Any paragraph number preceded by a letter (e.g., A.1.1) is
an annex item. Terms such as should and recommended are prevalent in annex paragraphs.

     
发表于 2015-12-19 23:16:43 | 显示全部楼层
shall应
should可
     
发表于 2015-12-21 22:54:54 | 显示全部楼层
大致就是咱们的“应”和“宜”吧。哈哈
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版积分规则

关闭

热帖推荐上一条 /1 下一条

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|《建筑电气》杂志官方论坛 ( 蜀ICP备06020337号-1  

GMT+8, 2025-6-2 07:54 , Processed in 0.108672 second(s), 30 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表